Test Code MOGFS Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein (MOG-IgG1) Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) Assay, Serum
Specimen Required
Patient Preparation: For optimal antibody detection, specimen collection should occur prior to initiation of immunosuppressant medication.
Collection Container/Tube:
Preferred: Red top
Acceptable: Serum gel
Submission Container/Tube: Plastic vial
Specimen Volume: 2 mL
Collection Instructions: Centrifuge and aliquot serum into a plastic vial.
Forms
If not ordering electronically, complete, print, and send 1 of the following with the specimen:
-Neurology Specialty Testing Client Test Request (T732)
-General Request (T239)
Useful For
Diagnosis of inflammatory demyelinating diseases (IDD) with similar phenotype to neuromyelitis optica (NMO) spectrum disorder (NMOSD), including optic neuritis (single or bilateral) and transverse myelitis
Diagnosis of autoimmune myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-opathy
Diagnosis of NMO
Distinguishing NMOSD, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), optic neuritis, and transverse myelitis from multiple sclerosis early in the course of disease
Diagnosis of ADEM
Prediction of a relapsing disease course
Reflex Tests
Test ID | Reporting Name | Available Separately | Always Performed |
---|---|---|---|
MOGTS | MOG FACS Titer, S | No | No |
Method Name
Flow Cytometry
Reporting Name
MOG FACS, SSpecimen Type
SerumSpecimen Minimum Volume
1 mL
Specimen Stability Information
Specimen Type | Temperature | Time | Special Container |
---|---|---|---|
Serum | Refrigerated (preferred) | 28 days | |
Frozen | 28 days | ||
Ambient | 72 hours |
Reject Due To
Gross hemolysis | Reject |
Gross lipemia | Reject |
Gross icterus | Reject |
Clinical Information
Neuromyelitis optica (NMO), sometimes called Devic disease or opticospinal multiple sclerosis (MS) is a severe, relapsing, autoimmune, inflammatory and demyelinating central nervous system disease (IDD) that predominantly affects optic nerves and spinal cord.(1) The disorder is now recognized as a spectrum of autoimmunity (termed NMO spectrum disorders: NMOSD).(1-3) Brain lesions are observed in more than 60% of patients with NMOSD and approximately 10% will be MS-like.(4) Children tend to have greater brain involvement than adults, and brain lesions are more symptomatic than is typical for adult patients.(3) The clinical course is characterized by relapses of optic neuritis or transverse myelitis or both. Some patients may present with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). Many patients with NMOSD are misdiagnosed as having MS. More effective treatments combined with earlier and more accurate diagnosis has led to improved outcomes.
Approximately 80% of patients with NMO are seropositive for aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG.(5-7) In the remaining 20% of patients, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG is detected in up to a third.(8) The pathogenic target for the remaining patients remains unknown. Detection of MOG-IgG is diagnostic of central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory demyelination, where the clinical phenotype (NMOSD, optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, ADEM) may be similar, but the immunopathology (astrocytopathy vs oligodendrogyopathy) and clinical outcome (worse vs better) are different.(9) Detection of MOG-IgG also predicts relapse.(10) More importantly, MOG-IgG seropositive IDDs are distinct from MS and treated differently.(8, 9) Treatments for IDDs seropositive for MOG-IgG include corticosteroids and plasmapheresis for acute attacks and mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and rituximab for relapse prevention. Disease-modifying agents, treatments promoted for MS, have been reported to exacerbate MOG-IgG1 seropositive IDDs. Therefore, early diagnosis and initiation of appropriate immunosuppressant treatment is important to optimize the clinical outcome by preventing further attacks. In 2015, Waters and colleagues (11) from Oxford University established a novel cell-based assay for the measurement of IgG1 MOG antibodies based on previous findings that MOG antibodies are almost exclusively of the IgG1 subclass. They showed that their MOG-IgG1 flow cytometry assay eliminated false positive results without losing true positive results with low titers. The detection of MOG-IgG1 allowed non-MS demyelinating diseases (ADEM, AQp4-IgG negative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder including ON,TM) to be distinguished from MS.(12)
Using a similar assay to this MOG-IgG1 flow cytometry assay, demonstrated high specificity of their MOG-IgG1 assay in which 49 patients with MS, 13 healthy control sera, and 37 AQP4-seropositive serum samples were all negative at a dilution of 1:20. Of 58 patients fulfilling 2006 Wingerchuk criteria for NMO, 21 (36%) tested negative for AQP4-IgG. MOG-IgG1 was detected by cell-based assay in 8 (38%) of these cases.(13)
Testing of 1109 consecutive sera sent for AQP4-IgG testing(12) revealed 40 AQP4-IgG and 65 MOG-IgG1-positive cases. None were positive for both. The clinical diagnoses obtained in 33 MOG-IgG1-positive patients included 4 NMO, 1 ADEM, and 11 optic neuritis (n = 11). All 7 patients with probable MS were MOG-IgG1 negative. This study provides Class II evidence that the presence of serum MOG-IgG1 distinguishes non-MS CNS demyelinating disorders from MS (sensitivity 24%, 95% CI 9%-45%; specificity 100%, 95% CI 88%-100%).
This assay was developed using the MOG construct provided by Dr Waters,(11) and the validation was based on a blinded comparison with the Oxford assay. Comparison was also made with the Euroimmun fixed cell-based kit assay.(14)
A recent longitudinal analysis with 2-year follow-up suggested that persistence of MOG-IgG is associated with relapses thus warranting relapse prevention.(10) Detection of MOG-IgG1 allows distinction from MS and is generally indicative of a relapsing disease, mandating initiation of immunosuppression, even after the first attack in some, thereby reducing attack frequency and disability in the future.
Reference Values
Negative
Day(s) Performed
Monday, Tuesday, Thursday
Report Available
5 to 8 daysPerforming Laboratory
Mayo Clinic Laboratories in RochesterTest Classification
This test was developed and its performance characteristics determined by Mayo Clinic in a manner consistent with CLIA requirements. It has not been cleared or approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.CPT Code Information
86363
86363-titer (if appropriate)