Clinical Information

The rapid identification of subacute cognitive decline as autoimmune dementia facilitates optimum treatment with immunotherapy and an expedited search for a limited stage of cancer in some patients. Traditionally, neurologists have been reluctant to consider a diagnosis of an autoimmune cognitive disorder in the absence of delirium. However, some recent case series and clinical-serologic observations have suggested a growing appreciation for autoimmune neurologic disorders presenting with features of a rapidly progressive dementia rather than delirium. These disorders can affect all age groups.

Unfortunately, these potentially reversible conditions may be misdiagnosed as being progressive neurodegenerative (currently irreversible) disorders with devastating consequences for the patient. In the evaluation of a patient with cognitive decline, clinicians should consider the possibility of an autoimmune etiology on their list of differential diagnoses. The importance of not overlooking this possibility rests in the experience that these patients have a potentially immunotherapy-responsive, reversible disorder. The development and widespread availability of neural antibody marker testing has changed this perspective so that other presenting symptoms, such as personality change, executive dysfunction, and psychiatric symptoms, are increasingly recognized in an autoimmune context.

Clues that are helpful in identifying patients with an autoimmune dementia can be summarized as a triad of:

-Suspicious clinical features (a subacute onset of symptoms, a rapidly progressive course, and fluctuating symptoms) and radiological findings

-Detection of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or serological biomarkers of autoimmunity

-Response to immunotherapy

Detection of neural autoantibodies in serum or CSF serves 2 purposes: to inform the physician of a likely autoimmune etiology and to raise suspicion for a paraneoplastic cause. The neurological associations of neural autoantibodies tend to be diverse and multifocal, although certain syndromic associations may apply. For example, LGI1 (leucine-rich, glioma inactivated 1) antibody was initially considered to be specific for autoimmune limbic encephalitis, but, over time, other presentations have been reported, including rapidly progressive course of cognitive decline mimicking neurodegenerative dementia.

Since neurological presentations are often multifocal and diverse, comprehensive antibody testing is usually more informative than testing for 1 or 2 selected antibodies. Some of the antibodies are highly predictive of an unsuspected underlying cancer. For example, small-cell lung carcinoma (antineuronal nuclear antibody-type 1 [ANNA-1]; collapsin response-mediator protein-5 neuronal [CRMP-5-IgG]), ovarian teratoma (N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor [NMDA-R]), and thymoma (CRMP-5 IgG).

Also, a profile of seropositivity for multiple autoantibodies may be informative for cancer type. For example, in a patient presenting with a rapidly progressive dementia who has CRMP-5-IgG, and subsequent testing reveals muscle acetylcholine receptor (AChR) binding antibody, the findings should raise a high suspicion for thymoma. If an associated tumor is found, its resection or ablation optimizes the neurological outcome.

Antibody testing on CSF is additionally helpful particularly when serum testing is negative, although, in some circumstances, testing both serum and CSF simultaneously is pertinent. Testing of CSF is recommended for some antibodies (eg, NMDA-R antibody and glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP]-IgG) because CSF testing is more sensitive and specific.